Legal rights in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), detailing donor anonymity and non-parentage, recipient parental rights, and the rights of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)-conceived children to know their genetic origins. With evolving legal rights in ART, the focus is on fairness, transparency, and ethical practices to protect all involved.


ART has provided hope by helping many people with infertility find solutions and parents who desire children. This rapid progress in the field of reproductive medicine has led to a complex web of legal regulations surrounding donor rights, recipient rights, and the rights of children born via ART. Legal rights of ART and ethical matters are part of ensuring that the rights and responsibilities of all parties are clear and protected and that ethical practices are maintained throughout the process.
When it comes to ART procedures, the legal rights of ART also ensure that donors' anonymity and confidentiality are protected, including donors' sperm, eggs, and embryos, which are essential. Their legal rights and obligations will depend on the country and jurisdiction in which the donation occurs and the terms of the donation itself.
Sperm and egg donors are allowed to remain anonymous in many countries. As a result, the intended parents and the children conceived as a result of the donation might not have access to the donor’s personal information. (One possible model: In some jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, children born via donor conception can access identifying information about their donor when they enter adulthood (typically around 18). This points to a growing understanding of the child’s right to know their biological origins.
In countries with anonymous donations, often the identity of the donor is not disclosed, ensuring their privacy and personal information. This means that donors are also not really liable for the child who comes from their donation, as their responsibility is limited to providing genetic material.
In most assisted reproductive technology (ART) systems, donors give up all legal claims on the child created from their donation. That includes parental rights and responsibilities. These regulations are vital to establish the Legal Rights of ART, ensuring that recipients are recognized as the legal parents of the child conceived. Donors are not required to support or raise the child. The principle is most applicable in sperm or egg donation (a donor has no legal ties to a child produced this way, even though he or she contributes genetic material).
But laws can differ when it comes to donating embryos, as a donor’s legal rights and responsibilities may depend on terms established by the intended parents and the clinic. In some jurisdictions, the donor’s non-parental rights are enumerated, making it clear that the child’s legal parents are intended to be just that.
Recipients of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments are individuals or couples who want to become pregnant using sperm, eggs, or embryos donated by others. These persons, who can be heterosexual couples, same-sex couples, or individuals, are automatically regarded as the legal parents of the child conceived through ART because of specific legal rights.
Many jurisdictions automatically recognize recipients as legal parents to any child conceived via ART. For instance, a woman who carries the pregnancy and receives an embryo from a donor is usually the legal mother, regardless of whether the embryo is her own or from a donor. In some countries, if sperm donation is involved, the legal father, if applicable, is considered the parent as well.
In these cases, some jurisdictions require legal proceedings like adoption or a parental order to recognize the recipients as the legal parents of the child. Where surrogacy is involved, especially when a surrogate mother has carried a child to term, this is particularly prevalent. For example, intended parents may have to apply for a parental order after a surrogacy arrangement to obtain their legal parenthood status.
In most countries, the recipients are entitled to know about the donor; however, the amount of information varies. The Legal Rights of ART safeguard the child’s access to genetic information, ensuring their right to know their biological ancestry. In an anonymous donation, recipients usually only get limited information, such as the donor’s medical history and physical traits. Here are some answers that addressed those fears and clarified what having a donor-conceived child ultimately means. As discussions around donor-conceived children progressed, concerns and inquiries emerged regarding their rights in relation to anonymous donors, provided these fall within the applicable legal framework.
If the maintenance recipient is in a relationship, they should learn their rights and protections in case of divorce or separation. Many jurisdictions ensure that the person who partners with the recipient is automatically recognized as the child’s second legal parent, even if he or she did not provide genetic material. This is especially relevant to same-sex couples who may not be biologically related to the child but wish to have legal parental rights.
The unique legal issues surrounding ART-conceived children include that of the right to know about their genetic ancestry. As ART becomes widely used, many legal systems have updated to recognize these rights.
A well-recognized legal right of children born via ART concerns their right to know their genetic origins. Although this right is often counterbalanced by the donor’s right to anonymity, in many countries legislation is moving towards allowing children born from donor sperm, eggs, or embryos the right to information about their biological parent(s) once they reach adulthood.
In jurisdictions with this right, ART-conceived children can request identifying information about their sperm or egg donor once they reach the age of majority. This assumes that people have a right to know their biological heritage, which is vital to their identity and health.
ART-related children usually have the same or similar inheritance rights as children conceived naturally. This means that they have a legal right to inherit from both their biological and legal parents. But it all gets a bit more complicated when we add donors to the equation. The donor has no inheritance rights to the child, though the third party’s legal parents (the recipients) have full inheritance rights to the child.
Because the latter are the child’s legal parents, either genetic or intended if the child is born via surrogacy, they are deemed the child’s legal guardians and can make decisions about their upbringing and welfare, just like any other biological child.
Access to a donor’s health history is also what a private donor would need to consider when it comes to children conceived with ART. In many countries, recipients receive detailed medical information about the donor’s genetic background, including family health histories, which can be critical to the child’s well-being. In some places, donors must submit detailed health records to help ensure that the child has relevant medical history.
The existing legal framework then often guarantees that a child born through ART has access to information about their biological parent in those cases where later genetic testing or health intervention is required in life, and this information might help medical treatment.
The legal rights of ART for those involved in donor conception aim to protect donors, recipients, and children born through ART to ensure that ethical guidelines are adhered to, thus creating a legal framework for ART. In many countries, a clear legal framework for these reproductive technologies is provided through the recognition of the rights to the following: anonymity, non-parentage, parental rights, and access to genetic information.
As ART advances, so do the laws governing it, to meet the needs of an increasing population of families created through IVF, sperm and egg donation, and surrogacy in ways that promote fairness, transparency, and respect for all three parties involved in the final outcome. At a minimum these legal protections are vital for creating a positive and ethical climate for assisted reproduction, to consider the rights of all parties involved, and to foster the welfare of children born through ART.
